The fore/aft motion of the LCA is designed to control bump-steer. This is the tendency of the car to steer itself in response to hitting bumps on one side of the car or the other. Without the compliance in the system to allow the wheel encountering the bump to move slightly backwards as it rises, the car would pull offline. The goal of the suspension design is to keep the car under control in as many conditions as possible. The basic design of the DeLorean (and most other street cars) is to have the car tend towards understeer in panic situations, as most drivers initial reactions to an emergency situation put the car into oversteer. Braking while turning, lifting off the accelerator in a turn, etc. That compliance is there for a reason. As long as your suspension components are in good shape, that "sloppiness" provides predictable responses to driver inputs. As far as Bill's claims that his modifications are an upgrade, I would have to say the jury is still out. I would venture to say noone has "done the math" to model just what the new components are doing as far as range of motion, spring rates, rates of change to toe, camber and caster, roll resistance etc. His changes automatically come with a bunch of new suspension components like bushings and ball joints, which will automatically provide improved feel and response, somewhat independent of the other changes. Comparing old stuff to different new stuff is not a valid comparison. You need to compare the new components to a properly set up original suspension with new bushings and ball joints all around. And then the cars need to be subjected to identical driving conditions in controlled environments. A test is worth a thousand opinions. -- Mike ________________________________ From: Tom Niemczewski <dmctom@xxxxxxxxx> To: dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Fri, October 28, 2011 9:11:32 AM Subject: Re: [DML] Upgraded Front Suspension From: "Martin Gutkowski" > Ed's setup attempts to restrain the fore/aft movement of the arm > altogether when there is a reason for it in the first place. > Martin Martin, What is the intended fore/aft movement in the LCA? What's the reason for it and what good does that movement do? I can't see any advantage in having LCAs so sloppy. To me this setup is nothing short of a disaster. Under braking when the arms move back they compress the springs unevenly, put unnecessary strain on the shocks and the most important thing it destroys the entire geometry of the suspension system - caster becomes positive, camber becomes positive, toe goes way in. If the goal here is to loose grip and destroy the tires then this setup is perfect. Am I missing something? Please put me on the right track. Thank you Greetings from Poland! Tom Niemczewski Vin 6149 plus 2418, 3633, 5030, 16473, 17086 Google earth: 52°25'17.66"N, 21° 1'58.40"E ------------------------------------ To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnewsYahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnewsYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: dmcnews-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx dmcnews-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/