--- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, melogranaa@... wrote: > > It is the author who is the lowly investment banker in the book. > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Josh Haldeman" <jhaldeman@...> > > Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:11:41 > To: <dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [DML] New DeLorean Book...Maybe a Movie! Wow!! > > > Robert, > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but it doesn't sound like you've read the book. > This is NOT what the author is portraying in the least. Not even close. > John is portrayed as something of a mild folk hero, not a "lowly investment > banker". You don't want people to make assumptions about your car and it's > maker, so why are you turning right around and making them about this author > and his work? Shouldn't you at least give the book a chance? > > > [moderator snip] > No, I have not read the book. However what I am basing this assumption off of is the fact that the author states that events have been fictionalized in the first link I posted that now appears to have been removed. Even in your post you stated the same, that the book is a work of fiction, based off of actual events. Going on that, how exactly would a reader be able to interpret what is fact, and what is fiction? This of course is compounded with a movie. At that point you're not witnessing the actual book itself, but rather the director's vision of how he/she feels the story should be told. Both the story and the viewer's experience are subject to the director's interpretations and/or personal viewpoints. Screenplays and film editing filter down to us what someone wants us to see, rather than what actually was written, let alone happened as even the author of the book itself has admittedly fictionalized things. Bottom line: if the director and others don't like, or are plainly uninformed about JZD, this may not turn out to be a positive movie at all. Especially now in the political climate of the world, with such heavy emphasis on financial affairs. If you release a film depicting John DeLorean being a caring business man who tried valiantly to save his company, it will be October 1982 all over again with people wishing their bosses and employers had gone to such efforts to save their jobs, winning huge amounts of sympathy from the masses. However, if you portray the same man as a deal-maker who was trying to simply put together profitable business and financial deals with little regard to tangible, material products, let alone any accountability to investors, the man will forever be scarred. His reputation will be forever sealed. Rather than being compared to Preston Tucker, he'll be thrown in with people like Bernie Ebbers and Kenneth Lay who actually did set out to defraud people. Especially when they realize that all 3 companies (DMC, WorldCom, & Enron) used Arthur Andersen as their accountants. We're dealing with a serious issue here, and need to make sure that these people are being responsible with the material they're dealing with. This is my concern. -Robert vin 6585 "X" ------------------------------------ To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnewsYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:dmcnews-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:dmcnews-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/