Ryan - nice sentiment, but with that letter, you have just established the value of the logo to be zero. Not a good business move. DMCH is not restricting the creation and sales of aftermarket parts, because they can't. Anybody can make and sell anything for the DeLorean as long as they don't use the DMC logo on the part or to advertise the part unless they have a license to use the logo from DMCH. There is no restraint of trade going on here. As an aside, you cannot selectively defend a trademark. This means that you can't stop somebody from putting it on a part without a license and then allow a hobbyist to put it on their website without a license. Trademark law does not distinguish between the two uses - it's an all or nothing game. -- Mike -------------- Original message from "Ryan Wright" <ryanpwright@xxxxxxxxx>: -------------- > On 9/16/06, mike.griese@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > Tom - no need to take it personally. This is just business. > > I disagree. > > Morally, I think Houston is doing a disservice to the DeLorean > community with these games. Were I Stephen, my letter to Tom would > read as follows: > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------- > Mr. Niemczewski, > > You are in violation of our trademark. (insert legal mumbo jumbo here) > > However, I believe you are doing a wonderful service to the DeLorean > community. As more and more enthusiasts such as yourself make > aftermarket parts available, interest in DeLorean automobiles > continues to rise. In the interest of cooperation with the community, > I invite you to license the use of our legal trademark so you may > legally continue your activities. The following license agreement > gives you the right to continue using the DMC logo for a period of (1) > year and will have to be reevaluated and renewed yearly. This license > is currently free to you; all we ask is that you fill it out and mail > it back to us. > > Sincerely, > > (my name) > > (insert license agreement here) > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------- > > I'm sorry, but unless Houston is dealing with a competitor, I see no > other acceptable alternative to this situation than the one presented > above. I can understand their defending their trademark and I can > understand their not wanting someone to produce parts that directly > compete with their own. What I don't understand is their not allowing > the production of aftermarket parts that they themselves do not > produce, or going after enthusiasts' web sites, etc. > > You can defend your trademark and still allow people like Tom to sell > parts and operate a slick looking web site with the DMC logo. > > -Ryan To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:dmcnews-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:dmcnews-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/