Hello All: Great to meet a bunch of you at DCS 2006! I feel compelled to respond to, what seems to be, an attack on our Stainless Steel frame solution for the DeLorean and the effort that was required to make this product available to the DeLorean community. While I applaud the effort put forth by John Dore on his restoration, I am offended by his comments. John fails to realize the amount of time and effort required to build a stainless steel frame for our cars. Three paragraphs from John's posting talk about loss of design features in the Stainless Steel frame. John states that "In my opinion, it doesn't take much effort to keep these little design features...". Let me be very clear that John's opinion in this matter reflects his lack of understanding for the fabrication process. John should have realized what he was saying when typing the words "stamped design". If it were our desire to produce the stainless frames using a stamped design, at the quantities we are producing, the cost per frame would easily exceed $90,000 per frame. If we were producing thousands of frames, the cost would be more reasonable. John's second attack on the stainless frames is that you really don't need the stainless frame to get the added benefit of strength. While I agree that you can weld in thicker than original material in key areas, this is not a complete solution. I usually don't post commercials to the DML, but in this situation, I believe it is warranted. The improvements of the PDC Stainless Frame are: 1. Stronger overall design using thicker material for construction. This results in a frame with much less flex than the original. Drivers comments comparing the stock DeLorean frame to the stainless steel frame are like comparing night and day. You can really drive the car like a sports car. One driver commented that the DeLorean with the Stainless Frame handled as good or better than his current model BMW. 2. The front crumple tube is removable for easy replacement in the event of damage. 3. The inner diameter of the front shock towers have been made slightly wider to eliminate spring noise. 4. The center section has been engineered to allow for changing a frame from a manual transmission to an automatic or an automatic to a manual. 5. The new trailing arm mounting system eliminates forever the problem with broken trailing arm bolts and lost spacers. 6. The rear of the frame is a bolt on section which can be removed to allow easier servicing or removal of the engine. As a a final note, it is important to mention that John's financial account of the amount of money required for the "galvanizing approach" is lacking some serious analysis. John's posting would lead you to believe that complete frame repair and galvanizing cost only $1,200 US. In order for this to be true, you would have to assume that the tools and supplies he used did not have any cost. Further, you would have to assume that John's or your time and expertise is worth NOTHING. I know a significant amount of time was spent on this frame restoration. If you lack the ability to perform this work yourself, you will have to pay someone to do it. The big problem with this approach is that you have no idea, up front, what each individual frame will require. In 1992 I researched the options available for my DeLorean with a seriously rusted out frame. The stainless steel option was and remains the best choice. While it sounds as if John's frame turned out just fine, I am aware of other galvanizing projects that did not have a positive outcome. Last Fall I worked with John to determine shipping and other costs to get a Stainless Frame sent to him. I felt that we had positive interaction so I am confused about this attack on my product and the effort to produce it. -- =============================================== Bryan Pearce Pearce Design Components 2N629 Jefferson St. West Chicago, IL 60185 Phone: (630) 293-0945 Fax: (630) 293-0944 DeLorean Part Fabrication =============================================== On Jun 23, 2006, at 7:11 AM, John Dore wrote: > The other thing about the stainless frame that I just realised the > other day, is that the stainless steel frame loses out on a lot of > the design detail features of the original frame. For example, the > front frame extension in the stainless frame appears to be missing > the edge strip on the top and bottom plates (in the center of the > frame extension). Its hard to explain, but take a look at the > pictures of the stainless frame on the website > http://www.deloreancarshow.com and then compare them to the pictures > of the front of my frame, and you will see what I mean. > > There are other areas on the stainless steel frame where again, > design features are lost, such as the plate under the engine cross > member with the ribs stamped into it. Or, the pressed holes on the > bottom of the front frame extension, through which you bolt on your > steering rack, are now just flat holes. Basically, it seems anywhere > where there was once a stamped design, it has been replaced by laser > cut flat pieces. I know that you can argue that these little > features "are not needed", and that the frame is strong enough > without them... > > In my opinion, it doesn't take much effort to keep these little > design features, especially for a such a high price tag, and its nice > to keep the frame looking as original as possible. > If you're > thinking that the stainless frame has the additional benefit of extra > strength over the original frame, you can always do as I did, and > weld in thicker than original metal in key areas. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/