I feel better knowing my car wasn't the only one called "ugly" by Dave so I guess I am in good company. Anyone else? For what it's worth, both of my cars were, and one still is, restoration projects. Greg -----Original Message----- From: dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of kKoncelik@xxxxxxx Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 3:19 PM To: dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [DML] Re: Value of VIN 16118, ebay 928 mile? car NEED ADVICE Thanks Dave You hurt Gigawatts feelings LOL As I have said the appearance of undercoating is not as clean and is much harder to maintain But to say its ugly :-( Anyway I do find it preserves the Zinc plating real well. Ken Owner of two undercoated 1983 cars LOL -----Original Message----- From: Dave Swingle <swingle@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 13:41:29 -0000 Subject: [DML] Re: Value of VIN 16118, ebay 928 mile? car NEED ADVICE My opinions FWIW There's a lot of discussion on the concours list about the undercoating - but that's another story. IMO I don't like it because it can actually mask frame degradation, makes working under the car very unpleasant, and looks ugly. To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/