The thing here is it's not about what journalists print, and what they don't print, nor even the inaccuracies in their information. It's about how they present the information, in an effort to get their own opinions across. Politics are perhaps the best example out there. You can have two separate reporters write a their own stories about the same event. And depending upon what their own political views are about said subject, you will end up with two entirely separate stores. Yes, you will have these two reporters state the same facts, but how these facts are presented, will completely change the positions of those involved, and thus the positive or negative light on on the people, and/or the subject matter involved. And ultimately, will influence you and how you feel about the subject. Last years Presidential election is the best example of this. And hell, even if you don't lie, you can easily exclude facts that hurt the opinion that you want your readers to develop. Or even include semi-relevant ones that help your political outlook. Here is a perfect example. Neutral: 8583 DMC-12 cars were built during the company's 2-year operation. Negative: Only 8583 DMC-12 cars were produced during the companies 2-year run, before it closed among scandals of money laundering, and John DeLorean being arrested on drug trafficking charges. During his trial, DeLorean's high profile lawyer Howard Weitzman, who also successfully got OJ Simpson acquitted, managed to get John DeLorean acquitted of all charges, without him ever having to testify himself. Even after they were produced, DMC-12 required many thousand of hours, and dollars in warranty work, so that they could become roadworthy for those people who ended up buying them. Positive: During it's two year run, the factory set in an impoverished area of Northern Ireland, known as Dunmurray. Although this was the very first, and in some cases only job that these workers had, they managed to build 8583 DMC-12 cars in the two years that the plant was in operation. Of this, it is estimated that well over 6,000 of these cars are still on the road, and are driven by their loyal owners. It is not uncommon to find that after 25 years, many owners still use their DeLorean automobiles daily. They have proven so reliable in fact, that some even rely upon them as their only mode of transportation! Later on John DeLorean was arrested by the FBI on charges related to drug trafficking. He was acquitted by a jury of 12, when it was proven that he was entrapped by the government. A common belief shared among many DeLorean owners and enthusiasts is that it may possibly have been the "Big Three" in Detroit who were scarred that DeLorean posed a serious threat to them. Much in the same way as to what happened with Preston Tucker, as he seriously criticized Detroit's lack of concern with consumer safety in his book, "On a Clear Day, you can see General Motors". Now, take in all three stories that I wrote above. Did I write any inaccuracies? No. I set out to write that there were 8583 cars built, and I did just that. However, I still continued to put both whatever spin upon the subject that I could. And I gave examples of both negative and positive reporting, dependent upon how I wanted to present the information. If I want the reader to share my negative outlook on a particular subject, then I'll package all negative information that's relevant to it, in with it. And vice-versa. It's like the musical score in a movie, that wants to set the tone of joy, fear, etc... You wouldn't but a banjo into the score for a horror movie where someone is about to die, just as you wouldn't want to include information that detracts from your opinion. "Journalistic Integrity" should go beyond simply reporting the facts, and should encompass a writer NOT including their personal feelings on a subject, whether or not I agree with them. Last time I checked, that's what the editorial section was for. If John DeLorean's story has ever taught me anything, it's that I have no idea what in the world is going on around me. -Robert vin 6585 "X" --- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Joe Thome" <joethome@xxxx> wrote: > > I of course don't know what you have been reading David, but everything I > have read about John DeLorean which mentioned his drugs charges has also > said that he was acquitted of those charges. > > To publish that someone was arrested or charged with a crime and then not go > on to say what the ultimate disposition was, would be grossly irresponsible > journalism. I can't imagine any editor worth his or her salt that would > allow such a grievous omission to occur. > > Can you site any specific examples where that occurred? > > Joe Thome > Owner of 6467 To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/