Marc, Those are good points, and I should probably clarify. I don't deny the pressures you mention below (regardless of who paid for them), but the cars were not selling as quickly as their production rate by 1982. I attribute this to a bad market, and it's not John's fault. I think we can all agree that what happened after it was all over is a shame. For those whose feathers were ruffled by that sentence in my last post, go back an re-read the last paragraph of what I wrote as that was the point I was really making. Jake (Gotta monitor the list closely after making a post to keep the flames at a smolder) Marc Levy <malevy_nj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: This is a matter of opinion. JZD had a lot of forces working against him. Most of it was financed by Detroit (IMHO). Thatcher pulled the British funding, and Thatcher was good buddies with Regan, who was funded by Detroit. Similar political pressure was likely used to entrap JZD in the drug deal. The shame is, thousands of jobs were lost and the man's (JZD) reputation was destroyed all in the interest of profit for a group of private companies with a lot of money in Washington.... Meanwhile the American *AND* British taxpayers had to foot the bill all to protect the profits of Detroit. --- Jake Kamphoefner wrote: > > -Detroit and the US government had nothing to do > with putting DMC out of business. The market did. > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/