The PRV is a very good engine, grossly underestimated on this side of the ocean. Douvrin made nearly 1,000,000 units over a 25 year production run -- they certainly couldn't have done so with a flawed design! While it is a relatively rare power plant in the US, the PRV was used extensively in Europe and Australia, and even made its way into the racing circuit. But... When the PRV was adapted for K Jetronic fuel injection, a couple of wrinkles were introduced: - Some original design components became very difficult to access - New components were added, which at 13-30 years of age may not work as reliably as when they left the factory That is why I opted to convert mine to carburetion. Ease of access was the single biggest factor. I do not have all weekend to devote to a tune up (typical for K Jetronic equipped engines). Reliability was also high on my list. See Message #48334 for comparative advantages of carburation as I see them. About half a dozen other owners have also expressed an interest in experimenting with carburetion. Doing so would be low cost and non-permanent (which begs the question: why is it so controversial?). But carbureted intake manifolds are very hard to come by. That is why I am trying to adapt more common LH Jetronic manifolds (used on 1989- Volvos and perhaps Chrysler Eagles). BTW: my DeLorean already uses a Volvo A Series manifold (on a Peugeot numbered block, circa 1985), adapted to accept a Motorcraft carburetor. Back to your original question: notice that DMC Joe and I are not disagreeing about the quality of PRV's. We are merely disagreeing about *WHEN* that quality was introduced. Certainly by the time of DeLorean production those engines were capable of hundreds of thousands of miles of propulsion. Bill Robertson #5939 >--- In dmcnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "alex morgan" <mauibarber@xxxx> wrote: > > Ok, I'm confused. Is the PRV6 a good engine or not? And are intake > manifolds difficult to get? I searched the archives and could not find very > many engine complaint stories. I would think an intake manifold would be a > readily available part or a part that wouldnt be that difficult to tool. > Can anybody clear this up? > Alex > To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/