Uh, nice sentiment, but wrong. Trademarks have value. Sometimes lots of value - think of Pepsi, Coca Cola, IBM, HP, Ford, the Chevrolet bowtie. It takes a lot of time and effort to build the reputation that is behind those trademarks. Just seeing those logos gives you an immediate impression in your mind about the brand they represent. Defending trademarks is a Very Serious Thing. If you as a trademark holder do not aggressively protect your trademark, you can and will lose it. Inspecting products that others produce that use your logo is not enough to protect the trademark. You must have agreements in place that define precisely the terms under which the logo may be used. The price charged for licensing a logo is a measure of the effort to protect it. If you as a trademark holder freely license your logo to anyone you are diluting that logo's value and you are giving a lot of the brand definition to others. Should you later decide that you want to charge for use, you can be sued and lose not only your attempt to charge you can also lose exclusive use of the trademark. -- Mike > I was hoping you wouldn't bring this up since I already have a patent > attorney working on it. > But since you brought it up.... > > Yes, when I made my shifter medallions using the old "DMC" logo, James sent > me a letter > telling me that I should have approved it with them first, and to promise > not to sell them > or else he would "take legal actions". > I talked with James on the phone and asked: > "How is it that all these other Delorean related parts sellers sell logo'd > merchandise then?" > He says that they have signed "License agreements" to do so. >