One thing you must take into account in reedesigning the lock module is the inductance it must control ie: the lock solenoids are coils which when you try to stop putting electric into them (like when the relay contacts open) the coils still have a lot of "electrical inertia" re: inductance, so the current will try to continue which results in arcing across the contacts. The heat generated will eventually weld the contacts unless you oversize the contacts and use capacitors to reduce the arcing. Using an undersize circuit breaker is a very temporary solution. Circuit breakers must have a margin of capacity above what is being used in the circuit (They are not meant to be tripped often). They are primaraly used to protect the wiring from overheating, not devices. If you find a circuit breaker to work at this low (sensitive) level it will eventually get very sensitive and start tripping at lower and lower levels so that it won't let the coils activate. In cases where you need accurate and sensitive circuit tripping you must look for a better solution that a mechanical circuit breaker or a fuse, you will need a circuit capable of sensing current draw and shuting down the lock module something like used in modern amplifiers speaker output circuitry. (This just keeps getting more and mote complicated!) David Teitelbaum vin 10757 --- In dmcnews@xxxx, dherv10@xxxx wrote: > Walt and group. Again I'm not making a case to save the door lock module, But > I finally made mine lock up also and it was in the position of the door > switch. So, If your carefully you might be able to avoid the problem. Also, > the smaller circuit breaker played a big part in the module not burning up. > It tripped very often till I caught it in-between locks and unlocked the > doors.