I won't claim to be a brake system engineer or anything, but here is what I've picked up during my membership in the SCCA and spending some time hanging around the track and helping to crew a car: You might get more oversteer if the cross-drilling does increase the performance of the front brakes, but only under extreme circumstances. I doubt that you'll notice much of a difference in normal street driving, assuming that you had very good brakes on the car before. If you do find that the brake feel isn't quite what you want you can adjust it by changing to different pads. You WILL notice quite a bit of difference in the brakes if it's been a while since you last did a brake job on the car, and the natural tendency is to credit that change to the drilled rotors. But, in back to back tests that I have seen, the difference between cross-drilled rotors and a set of new non-drilled rotors was very slight under normal driving. Usually you will only get INCREASED braking force from cross-drilled brakes under extreme heat conditions when the cross drilling will allow the rotors to cool quicker. That was the whole idea behind this; to cool the brakes faster on the track. The street guys picked it up because the drilled rotors look cool. But on the street you don't normally get the high heat situations that you do on the track. You can actually decrease braking force slightly by having reduced the swept area by drilling holes. Anyway, I would say to put them on if you like them. Try it, then adjust the brakes using different pad compounds on the front vs. the rear to fine tune it. Mark N At 01:45 AM 4/23/01 -0400, you wrote: >I specifically want to know if the braking characteristics of having >cross-drilled rotors only on the front will interfere with the front/rear >brake proportioning. If the front brakes worked better than designed, and >the rear brakes worked normal, then could that make the car more prone to >oversteer? > >Walt Tampa, FL > >