There seems to be a huge inconsistency in moderation. While it is expected that each moderator may judge something different than another, it is more disturbing that a single given moderator seems to make decisions on messages based on the SENDER. I can think of a number of examples where I was "called names" with no facts or even opinions to support the argument... and yet not given the opportunity to respond publicly while refraining from calling my attacker "names". The double standard is my biggest complaint. The power of the moderators steer the discussion can have a huge impact on the reputation of specific members of the community. It is a power that I feel is sometimes abused. If there was consistency in moderation, no matter who posts the message, this would be less of a problem. --- Dave Swingle <swingle@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: <SNIP> > moderation works both ways. We won't allow you to > call anyone names, > conversely, we won't allow them to call you names > either. <SNIP> To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/