Actually I didn't say that in my original mail - I was listing a difference that Renault made. However, I have had an answer from a Renault guy who pointed out that as long as you've got mass-air-flow sensing of some sort (which K-Jet basically is) and continuous injection, like a carb, then odd-firing isn't a problem for a turbo. It all comes down to the metering of the fuel. Also for a higher performance engine, the counterweights on the crank shaft are detrimental to performance. Going even-fire allows the pistons to balance each-other Remember the PRV was originally meant to be a V8. 90 degree V6's are rare because they have to be odd-fire in order to run smoothly. Renault got around this on the even-fire lumps by adding an eccentric weight to the camshafts Martin Dick Ryan wrote: >One thing I do not understand is the constant refernce >to turbos not being "odd-fire" friendly. Man, have >you ever ridden in a Buick Grand National? Now >there's a turbocharged odd-fire V-6 engine that >screams. Though I'm certainly not an expert, the >owners I have known have not had bad things to say >about them. > > To address comments privately to the moderating team, please address: moderators@xxxxxxxxxxx For more info on the list, tech articles, cars for sale see www.dmcnews.com To search the archives or view files, log in at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dmcnews/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dmcnews-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/