Re: [DMCForum] Re: DeLorean MPG (Marc)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DMCForum] Re: DeLorean MPG (Marc)



I did not read your comment on MPG as being DeLorean
specific.  It seemed more like a general statement of
engine power VS fuel economy.

So, I will agree that there is a inverse relationship
(in general) of Fuel economy VS Engine performance,
but as you said yourself there are plenty of other
factors that go in to that equation.

FWIW, I have never calculated my MPG.  Probably
should, to keep track of any problems..  But I find I
can cut my range per fill-up in half based on how
heavy my foot is, so the number is not very useful.

--- content22207 <brobertson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Don't pull a Martin Gutkowski on me...
>
> Comparing the PRV to any other engine doesn't
> advance its MPG issue a
> bit. Throwing unrelated engine examples around only
> confuses things.
> The question isn't "how does a PRV compare to other
> engines?" The
> question is "is 30 MPG possible in a DeLorean
> equipped PRV?"
>
> I'll grant you my carb does run richer than F Series
> K Jetronic, but
> since F Series is too lean to begin with that is
> hardly a liability.
> And the real world effect is almost negligible --
> when caravaning I
> buy about a gallon more fuel than the stock cars
> (8-10% drop in fuel
> economy). To me it's worth hundreds times more than
> that to avoid all
> the crap associated with K Jetronic.
>
> I've jetted my carb as lean as I can go without a
> hard transition from
> idle to throttle, at least given my current
> accelerator pump (which is
> set at maximum travel). If you look closely at
> Pigeon Forge pics, the
> pump was set at minimum travel because combined
> jetting was .096".
> I've managed to drop it back to .092", but anything
> less jerks as the
> throttle plates open. I'm sure my single plane
> intake manifold doesn't
> help matters.
>
> But since the plugs look beautiful I'm not going to
> worry about it.
> The car has cosmetic issues that are much more
> pressing.
>
> Bill Robertson
> #5939
>
> >--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marc Levy
> <malevy_nj@xxxx> wrote:
> > A true statement, if you are still using a
> carburetor.
> >
> > There are many examples of engines that perform
> better
> > than a 1981 PRV, and get better fuel economy.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> --------------------~-->
> In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own
> computers.
> At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
>
http://us.click.yahoo.com/B9pRWD/3MnJAA/Y3ZIAA/HliolB/TM
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
>

> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>     DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>

>
>
>


           
Discover Yahoo!
Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/


Yahoo! Groups Links



Home Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN 


Copyright ProjectVixen.com. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
DMCForum Mailing List Archive  DMCNews Mailing List Archive  DMC-UK Mailing List Archive

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated