Re: [DMCForum] Re: DeLorean MPG (Marc)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DMCForum] Re: DeLorean MPG (Marc)
- From: Marc Levy <malevy_nj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 09:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
I did not read your comment on MPG as being DeLorean
specific. It seemed more like a general statement of
engine power VS fuel economy.
So, I will agree that there is a inverse relationship
(in general) of Fuel economy VS Engine performance,
but as you said yourself there are plenty of other
factors that go in to that equation.
FWIW, I have never calculated my MPG. Probably
should, to keep track of any problems.. But I find I
can cut my range per fill-up in half based on how
heavy my foot is, so the number is not very useful.
--- content22207 <brobertson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Don't pull a Martin Gutkowski on me...
>
> Comparing the PRV to any other engine doesn't
> advance its MPG issue a
> bit. Throwing unrelated engine examples around only
> confuses things.
> The question isn't "how does a PRV compare to other
> engines?" The
> question is "is 30 MPG possible in a DeLorean
> equipped PRV?"
>
> I'll grant you my carb does run richer than F Series
> K Jetronic, but
> since F Series is too lean to begin with that is
> hardly a liability.
> And the real world effect is almost negligible --
> when caravaning I
> buy about a gallon more fuel than the stock cars
> (8-10% drop in fuel
> economy). To me it's worth hundreds times more than
> that to avoid all
> the crap associated with K Jetronic.
>
> I've jetted my carb as lean as I can go without a
> hard transition from
> idle to throttle, at least given my current
> accelerator pump (which is
> set at maximum travel). If you look closely at
> Pigeon Forge pics, the
> pump was set at minimum travel because combined
> jetting was .096".
> I've managed to drop it back to .092", but anything
> less jerks as the
> throttle plates open. I'm sure my single plane
> intake manifold doesn't
> help matters.
>
> But since the plugs look beautiful I'm not going to
> worry about it.
> The car has cosmetic issues that are much more
> pressing.
>
> Bill Robertson
> #5939
>
> >--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marc Levy
> <malevy_nj@xxxx> wrote:
> > A true statement, if you are still using a
> carburetor.
> >
> > There are many examples of engines that perform
> better
> > than a 1981 PRV, and get better fuel economy.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> --------------------~-->
> In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own
> computers.
> At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
>
http://us.click.yahoo.com/B9pRWD/3MnJAA/Y3ZIAA/HliolB/TM
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
> DMCForum-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
Discover Yahoo!
Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/
Yahoo! Groups Links
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN