[DMCForum] Re: DMCH performance engine specifications (Rick G)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DMCForum] Re: DMCH performance engine specifications (Rick G)
- From: "content22207" <brobertson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:17:52 -0000
SAE change was made in 1971, I think (about the same time compression
was dropped across the board).
If Houston simply bumps compression up to Euro spec 9.5:1, that alone
yields 15+ NET horses.
I believe their dyno graph shows the red line moved closer to 7,000
RPM, which would indicate some sort of change in the valve train.
Freer flowing exhaust should be worth 5 or 10 HP.
Don't forget: HP calculation depends on engine speed -- all Houston
has to do is figure out a way to get 500 more RPM out of the PRV, and
HP goes up 10% on that basis alone.
BTW: are you including the Prelude engine in your claculations? The
high compression 500 should be ~390 gross HP. That's 390 HP @ ~3,500
RPM (which could almost double if you modified the valve train to spin
even faster). You do realize your 500 is producing more torque at IDLE
than even a turbocharged PRV will ever produce at throttle.
Bill Robertson
#5939
>--- In DMCForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "twinenginedmc12"
<twinenginedmc12@xxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm sure the DMCH performance engine is a fine engine, but it should
> be noted that the power specification they publish does not
> accurately compare to the stock specification.
>
> The OEM stock engine was rated 130 hp "NET", by law, which means the
> reading is taken with all accessories like water pump, alternator,
> air conditioning, intake, exhaust, etc, connected.
>
> The DMCH performance engine is rated 197 hp "BRAKE", meaning the
> reading is taken with no accessories connected. There doesn't even
> have to be coolant in the passages. In the nineteen seventies, the
> Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) abandoned specifying brake
> horsepower (BHP), because it does not accurately reflect the power
> available to move the car.
>
> Unless Delorean in Houston starts specifying their performance engine
> in NET horsepower, it's not possible to intelligently compare the two
> engines. I consider DMCH specifying their horsepower in BHP either
> misguided, or somewhat deceptive, depending on their motives, in that
> it leads people to believe the performance engine is more powerful
> than it is. This is precisely why the SAE stopped specifying power
> this way.
>
>
> Rick Gendreau 11472
> twin engine Delorean, 560 brake horsepower, 450 net horsepower, Gosh,
> what a fun car.
Yahoo! Groups Links
Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN