 
Re: [DMCForum] Shenanigans?
    
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DMCForum] Shenanigans?
- From: mike clemens <rmclemns@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:43:59 -0800 (PST)
Hey Bob
Quit moaning and crying!
IT'S TIME TO TALK ABOUT CAR STUFF..
Mike    1630
--- Bob Brandys <BobB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There are many inconsistencies with this election
> 
> 1. Historically,  according the yesterday's WSJ, if
> the market dropped 
>  >0.5% in October, the incumbent president would
> lose.  Well, it dropped 
> more than 0.5% in October. and BUSH won. This goes
> against history.
> 
> 2. Newly registered voters historically have always
> been more 
> democratic.    How many times  did all the pollsters
> say the new young 
> people who voted were mainly democratic.  Well, this
> sure did not appear 
> in the numbers.  
> 
> 3.  Since only 15% more people voted than in 2000 
> 105 million vs 120 
> million, WHY were there such long lines. These lines
> were not present in 
> 2004.  
> 
> 4. Since more electronic voting was used this year,
> and electronic 
> voting is almost twice as fast than paper ballots -
> Why were there such 
> long lines?  Was the number of polling places
> restricted.?  Were they 
> moved?  Two polling places in a democratic area in 
> republican 
> controlled dupage were moved to areas where there
> was no parking- the 
> day before the election.  On was a car dealer? Hey,
> any one who votes 
> the "right" way gets a discount!  and the other was
> in basement of an 
> old building on a dead end street.
> 
> 5. Since most of the new voter registrations were
> young people -who did 
> vote - according to the polls- then Kerry should
> have ended up with more 
> democratic votes. But he got less votes - which is
> in conflict with the 
> voter registration data.
> 
> 6. More black voters turned out than every before
> and they voted for 
> Kerry more than every before.  Than why did Kerry
> get less votes?
> 
> The only conclusion is the votes don't agree with
> the registration and 
> voting history statistics.  
> 
> Extrapolating the historical statistics Kerry should
> have won by at 
> least 10,000,000 votes.  
> Since he did not,  and if you believe that voting
> machines and vote 
> counting were rigged
> 
> (As Stalin said- it does not matter who votes- what
> matters is who 
> counts the votes)
> 
> Then approximately 15% of the votes were stolen or
> rigged.  (you heard 
> the stories about the machines in florida that would
> only vote for bush 
> both in the primary and in this election)
> What is strange is  NO Machine was ever found to be
> voting ONLY for 
> KERRY.  You computer dudes know this is not
> possible!
> 
> Only a detailed analysis of what happened by an
> unbiased party in the 
> future will explain why Kerry lost.  Or we may never
> know.  
> 
> Or american democracy is only an illusion!
> 
> BOB
> 
> 
> 
> 
            
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com 
 
| Yahoo! Groups Sponsor | 
|   | ADVERTISEMENT 
 ![click here]() |  | 
| ![]() | 
Yahoo! Groups Links
 Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN
 Back to the Home of PROJECT VIXEN